Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700KF is 61 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-12700KF - £66.52 vs £237.02
- Up to 69% better value when playing Valorant than Core i7-12700KF - £0.08 vs £0.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Valorant than Celeron G6900 - 919 vs 798 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
798
86%
Value, £/FPS
£0.08/FPS
100%
Price, £
£66.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £66.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
919
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.26/FPS
30%
Price, £
£237.02
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for £237.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |