Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 614 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-10700 - £66.48 vs £223.47
- Up to 71% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-10700 - £0.22 vs £0.75 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 0% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G6900 - 299 vs 298 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
298
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£66.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £66.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
299
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.75/FPS
29%
Price, £
£223.47
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for £223.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |