Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 1892 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X - £19.99 vs £178.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Control than Ryzen 7 5800X - £0.1 vs £0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Celeron G3900 - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
199
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13569 minutes ago
Buy for £178 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13570 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Skylake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |