Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-10500 - £19.99 vs £179.99
- Up to 88% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-10500 - £0.13 vs £1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-10500 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G3900 - 169 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
156
92%
Value, £/FPS
£0.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
169
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.07/FPS
12%
Price, £
£179.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for £179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |