Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 765 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 8% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G3900 - 207 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £156.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75014 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
42.941611234294164%
Multi-Core
992
20.893007582139848%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |