Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 2692 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - £19.99 vs £179.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 7600 - £0.08 vs £0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 119% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G3900 - 552 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
252
45%
Value, £/FPS
£0.08/FPS
100%
Price, £
£19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14075 minutes ago
Buy for £179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14075 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |