Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1871 days newer than Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Halo Infinite than Core i5-760 - 153 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
