Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 1144 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - £19.99 vs £108.89
- Up to 74% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i5-9400 - £0.28 vs £1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 41% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron G3900 - 100 vs 71 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
71
71%
Value, £/FPS
£0.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Buy for £108.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |