Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - £25.15 vs £144.97
- Up to 77% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i3-10300 - £0.26 vs £1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 33% better in Far Cry 6 than Celeron G3900 - 126 vs 95 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
95
75%
Value, £/FPS
£0.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£25.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £25.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
126
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.15/FPS
22%
Price, £
£144.97
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for £144.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |