Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - £128.82 vs £197.13
- Up to 31% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-11600 - £0.61 vs £0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 6% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G3900 - 224 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
211
94.19642857142857%
Value, £/FPS
£0.61/FPS
100%
Price, £
£128.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £128.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1605 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
224
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.88/FPS
69.31818181818181%
Price, £
£197.13
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for £197.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1605 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
27.379830348727612%
Multi-Core
992
12.115290669272106%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |