Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 1220 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 51 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3900 - 173 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £215 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77365 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
82.17821782178217%
Multi-Core
992
40.17820980153908%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |