Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 961 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - £19.99 vs £230.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Ryzen 7 2700X - £0.28 vs £2.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 35% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron G3900 - 96 vs 71 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
71
73%
Value, £/FPS
£0.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13438 minutes ago
Buy for £230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13439 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |