Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - £225.0 vs £238.88
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 43% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-3770K - 676 vs 474 FPS
- Up to 26% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-3770K - £0.35 vs £0.47 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 16 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11316 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
676
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.35/FPS
100%
Price, £
£238.88
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £238.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11316 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |