Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1197 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Death Stranding than Celeron G1840 - 222 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 24 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
222
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£409.61
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for £409.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
43.01533219761499%
Multi-Core
854
12.24197247706422%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |