Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3539 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 40% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G1840 - 139 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 32 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £481.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75918 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
16.721854304635762%
Multi-Core
854
4.674329501915709%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |