Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3071 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - £49.95 vs £465.99
- Up to 87% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i9-13900KF - £0.11 vs £0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 23% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G1840 - 558 vs 452 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 32 vs 2 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
452
81%
Value, £/FPS
£0.11/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 357 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
558
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.84/FPS
13%
Price, £
£465.99
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for £465.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 357 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |