Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700KF is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-11700KF - £49.95 vs £274.46
- Up to 78% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-11700KF - £0.21 vs £0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1840 - 289 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
236
81%
Value, £/FPS
£0.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
289
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.95/FPS
22%
Price, £
£274.46
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for £274.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |