Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 2805 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - £49.95 vs £224.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-12700F - £0.21 vs £0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 106% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G1840 - 498 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 20 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
242
48%
Value, £/FPS
£0.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 324 minutes ago
Buy for £224 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 324 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |