Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700KF is 2744 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-12700KF - £49.95 vs £198.99
- Up to 45% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-12700KF - £0.21 vs £0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700KF
- Performs up to 116% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G1840 - 522 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 20 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
242
46%
Value, £/FPS
£0.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3501 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
522
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.38/FPS
55%
Price, £
£198.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for £198.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3501 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |