Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 1713 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - £49.95 vs £320.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-9900KF - £0.28 vs £1.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Stray than Celeron G1840 - 186 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
176
94%
Value, £/FPS
£0.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Buy for £320 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |