Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - £49.95 vs £169.99
- Up to 53% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i5-11600K - £0.54 vs £1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 60% better in Far Cry 6 than Celeron G1840 - 147 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
92
62%
Value, £/FPS
£0.54/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
147
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.16/FPS
46%
Price, £
£169.99
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for £169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |