Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 2805 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - £49.95 vs £388.78
- Up to 85% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-12900F - £0.43 vs £2.95 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 14% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G1840 - 132 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 24 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
116
87%
Value, £/FPS
£0.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
132
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.95/FPS
14%
Price, £
£388.78
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for £388.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |