Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 266 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £416.21 vs £489.88
- Up to 11% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-13900K - £1.49 vs £1.67 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield V than Core i9-12900F - 294 vs 279 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
279
94%
Value, £/FPS
£1.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£416.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £416.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
294
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.67/FPS
89%
Price, £
£489.88
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for £489.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |