Buy on Amazon
£5.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $120
Availability
MSRP in USD: $120
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2699 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - £5.56 vs £109.97
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 9% better in Rocket League than Celeron G1610 - 730 vs 672 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1610 2.60 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processor LGA 1155
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X Processor (4C/8T, 18 MB Cache, 4.3 GHz Max Boost)
Buy for £109.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 3 3300X
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
25.508982035928145%
Multi-Core
739
12.756775418608665%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
