Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1109 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 1600X - 246 vs 238 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - £178.58 vs £225.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 3 3300X - £0.75 vs £0.91 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
238
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.75/FPS
100%
Price, £
£178.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £178.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Matisse | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |