Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1207 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-7700 - 193 vs 187 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Up to 7% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - £208.88 vs £225.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 3 3300X - £1.12 vs £1.17 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13186 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
187
96%
Value, £/FPS
£1.12/FPS
100%
Price, £
£208.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |