Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 3300X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9600K is 553 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 3 3300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 3 3300X - 62 vs 60 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - £168.88 vs £225.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 3 3300X - £2.72 vs £3.75 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12576 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
62
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.72/FPS
100%
Price, £
£168.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £168.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12576 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |