Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 21% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-7700 - 672 vs 556 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - £179.99 vs £208.88
- Up to 29% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-7700 - £0.27 vs £0.38 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15387 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
672
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.27/FPS
100%
Price, £
£179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15386 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |