Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-10700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-10700K - 458 vs 429 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - £154.16 vs £236.81
- Up to 38% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-10700K - £0.34 vs £0.55 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
458
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.34/FPS
100%
Price, £
£154.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £154.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2389 minutes ago
Buy for £236.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2390 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |