Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 891 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i9-10850K - 131 vs 125 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - £163.82 vs £295.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10850K - £1.25 vs £2.36 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £163.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Buy for £295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |