Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700KF is 1668 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-12700KF - £178.58 vs £224.21
- Up to 18% better value when playing Control than Core i7-12700KF - £0.89 vs £1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Ryzen 5 1600X - 206 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 20 vs 12 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
201
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.89/FPS
100%
Price, £
£178.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £178.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3447 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.09/FPS
81%
Price, £
£224.21
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for £224.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3446 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i7-12700KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |