Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 1435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - £178.58 vs £238.88
- Up to 14% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-11900KF - £1.41 vs £1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen 5 1600X - 146 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 16 vs 12 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
127
86%
Value, £/FPS
£1.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£178.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £178.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14360 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
146
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.64/FPS
85%
Price, £
£238.88
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for £238.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14360 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |