Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 2094 days newer than Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 48% better value when playing Control than Core i5-13400 - £0.5 vs £0.96 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Ryzen 5 1600X - 205 vs 201 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
201
98.04878048780488%
Value, £/FPS
£0.5/FPS
100%
Price, £
Value Winner
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
205
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.96/FPS
52.083333333333336%
Price, £
£197.98
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for £197.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1123
49.10362920857018%
Multi-Core
4766
45.986105750675414%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |