Buy on Amazon
£178.58
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $219
Availability
MSRP in USD: $219
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X and the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 2% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen 5 1600 - 102 vs 100 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - £178.58 vs £220.6
- Up to 21% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen 5 1600 - £1.75 vs £2.21 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 1600X
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
102
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.75/FPS
100%
Price, £
£178.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Desktop CPU - AM4/Hex Core/3.6GHz – 4GHZ turbo/ 16MB/95W
Buy for £178.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13948 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Desktop CPU - AM4 / Hex Core / 3.2 GHz /19MB / 65W
Buy for £220.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 1600X
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
