Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 3409 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - £5.56 vs £128.0
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron G1610 - 239 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75192 minutes ago
Buy for £128 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
20.084865629420083%
Multi-Core
739
7.595847466337753%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |