Buy on Amazon
£5.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 940 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - £5.56 vs £96.66
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 12% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron G1610 - 174 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1610 2.60 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processor LGA 1155
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 601 minutes ago
Intel Core i7 Quad-Core i7-6700 3.4GHz Processor CPU
Buy for £96.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-6700
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
32.94663573085847%
Multi-Core
739
17.85024154589372%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
