Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3340 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - £5.56 vs £119.95
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 55 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 12% better in Death Stranding than Celeron G1610 - 238 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
19.146067415730336%
Multi-Core
739
9.910151535470028%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |