Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 1855 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - £5.56 vs £156.66
- Up to 96% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i7-8700 - £0.03 vs £0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 27% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G1610 - 209 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
165
78%
Value, £/FPS
£0.03/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10274 minutes ago
Buy for £156.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |