Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1750 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 1600X - 195 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 58 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - £99.97 vs £119.95
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
Buy for £99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1123
50.47191011235955%
Multi-Core
4766
63.91310178355907%
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |