Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 6 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-10400F - 427 vs 416 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - £101.05 vs £225.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76349 minutes ago
Buy for £101.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76349 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
86.10778443113773%
Multi-Core
5751
99.27498705334024%
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |