Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 413 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £60.0 vs £521.99
- Up to 85% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £1.58 vs £10.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 26% better in Immortals of Aveum than Athlon 3000G - 48 vs 38 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
48
100%
Value, £/FPS
£10.87/FPS
14%
Price, £
£521.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for £521.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Athlon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |