Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1510 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - £60.0 vs £541.65
- Up to 85% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-14900 - £0.61 vs £3.98 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 37% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Athlon 3000G - 136 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 32 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Buy for £541.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |