Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 32 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than Athlon 3000G - 179 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
179
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£565
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44035 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
60.723350253807105%
Multi-Core
1975
21.075658947817736%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Picasso | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |