Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 162 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 25% better in Starfield than Athlon 3000G - 64 vs 51 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
54.71698113207547%
Multi-Core
1975
21.554076175924916%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
