Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Celeron G3930T
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $31.66 vs $604.65
- Up to 94% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.21 vs $3.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 21% better in God of War than Celeron G3930T - 198 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 32 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
164
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 259 minutes ago
Buy for €671.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 260 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |