Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 2202 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Celeron G3930T
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - $31.66 vs $160.63
- Up to 73% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 7600 - $0.23 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 36% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3930T - 208 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
153
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 261 minutes ago
Buy for €178.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 261 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |