Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 2561 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Celeron G3930T - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
189
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6850 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |