Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Celeron G3930T
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $31.66 vs $405.00
- Up to 83% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.26 vs $1.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 35 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 114% better in War Thunder than Celeron G3930T - 287 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 32 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
134
47%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Buy for €449.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |