Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1402 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Celeron G3930T
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - $31.66 vs $235.37
- Up to 84% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen 9 5900X - $0.13 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 15% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G3930T - 317 vs 275 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 24 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
275
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
Buy for €261.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 257 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |