Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Celeron G3930T
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - $35.14 vs $130.02
- Up to 71% better value when playing Control than Ryzen 7 5700X - $0.18 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Celeron G3930T - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
199
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6844 minutes ago
Buy for €130.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6844 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |